• Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. · Oct 2007

    Validation study of a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire for use in Iran.

    • Azade Safaee and Bijang Moghim Dehkordi.
    • Research Center of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. azadesafaee@yahoo.com
    • Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2007 Oct 1; 8 (4): 543-6.

    IntroductionRecently, it has been recognized that a more comprehensive assessment of the cancer patient is necessary and that the evaluation of outcomes must move beyond traditional biomedical endpoints to include assessments of the impact of disease and its treatment on patients' quality of life. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer has developed a 30-item quality of life questionnaire to obtain information about the impact of disease and treatment on the daily living of cancer patients. This questionnaire has been translated into many languages and used in various countries. However, version 3.0 has not yet been validated for use with Iranian patients. The aims of the present study were therefore to evaluate the reliability and validity of the new QLQ-C30 questionnaire.MethodWe conducted a cross-sectional study on 132 random samples of breast cancer patients. Reliability was evaluated through the internal consistency of multi-item subscales. Pearson's correlations of an item with its own scale (corrected for overlap) and other scales were calculated to evaluated convergent and discriminant validity. Clinical validity was evaluated by known-group comparisons. All calculations were performed using SPSS.V.13 software.ResultsIn the reliability analysis, most scales fitted the criteria except the fatigue (Alpha 0.65), pain (Alpha 0.69) and nausea and vomiting scales (Alpha 0.66). Convergent validity was evidenced by item own subscale correlation above 0.40 for all multi-item subscales. Item discriminant validity was successful in all analyses except for item 4 of the physical functioning scale. Results of the group based analysis show significant differences in QLQ-C30 functioning and symptom scores, where patients with higher grade have the worst outcome(P<0.05).ConclusionThe Iranian version of EORTC QLQC30 is a reliable and valid QOL measure for cancer patients which indicates that it can be used in clinical and epidemiological cancer research.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.