• Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. · Nov 2016

    Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.

    • Tabitha L Schrufer-Poland, Maria P Ruiz, Samuel Kassar, Christopher Tomassian, Stacey D Algren, and John D Yeast.
    • University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansas City, MO, United States. Electronic address: tlschrufer-poland@umkc.edu.
    • Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016 Nov 1; 206: 53-56.

    ObjectiveTo determine if there is a significant difference in composite wound complications among traditional closure techniques versus absorbable subcuticular staple closure.Study DesignThis study is a retrospective cohort study of cesarean sections performed from January through September of 2014. Composite wound complications included surgical site infection, separation, and fluid collection. Medical records were reviewed and data including the patient demographics, comorbidities, closure type and wound complications were recorded. Patients with incomplete data were excluded. Data were analyzed with ANOVA or Fisher exact test, according to data type.ResultsOf the 186 patients identified, 176 patients were included in the data analysis (n=83 suture, n=49 traditional staple, n=44 the absorbable subcuticular staple). The groups were similar in all demographic categories; labor prior to delivery, estimated blood loss, and medical and pregnancy related comorbidities. The overall incidence of wound complications at our institution during this study was 5.7%. The incidence of complications among the suture and subcuticular staple closure was not significantly different (3.6% versus 0%, p=0.3), however there were significantly less complications in the suture and subcuticular staple closure groups when compared to traditional staple closure (14.3%) (p=0.03 and p=0.01, respectively).ConclusionHerein, we report a decreased incidence of composite wound complications with subcuticular staple closure versus traditional staple closure in patients undergoing cesarean section. Absorbable subcuticular staple closure represents a convenient, safe and cost-effective closure technique.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…