• Nursing in critical care · May 2009

    The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care.

    • Monica Johansson and Eva Kokinsky.
    • Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. monica.rn.johansson@vgregion.se
    • Nurs Crit Care. 2009 May 1;14(3):122-30.

    Aims And ObjectivesTo evaluate the concurrent validity and reliability of the behavioural COMFORT and a modified version of the FLACC scale for assessment of pain and sedation in intubated and ventilated children and to evaluate the construct validity of the FLACC scale for assessment of pain.BackgroundFew instruments are available for assessment of pain/sedation in paediatric intensive care.DesignA prospective observational study was performed postoperatively in 40 children aged 0-10 years.MethodsTwo trained nurses observed the child simultaneously and assessing COMFORT behavioural (COMFORT-B) and FLACC scores. In comparison, two bedside nurses concurrently scored pain using an observational visual analogue scale (VAS(obs)) and sedation using the Nurse Interpretation of Sedation (NIS) score: oversedated, adequately or insufficient sedated. In 20 additional patients, one nurse assessed FLACC scores before and after analgesics.ResultsThe majority of patients were <1 year. A moderate but significant correlation was found between each scale and both sedation and VAS(obs). COMFORT-B differentiated better than FLACC between the three sedation levels. For those assessed to be in pain (VAS(obs) > 3), both COMFORT-B and FLACC scores were significantly different compared with VAS(obs) < 3. The interrater reliability was high for COMFORT-B and FLACC (kappa 0.71 and 0.63, respectively). For bedside nurses' assessment of pain, the interrater reliability was high (kappa 0.63) but low for the level of sedation (kappa 0.20). After administration of analgesics, the FLACC median score decreased significantly from 5 to 0.ConclusionsThe COMFORT-B scale was a more reliable measure of children's sedation than bedside subjective assessment and gives more substantial information about sedation than the FLACC scale. Concurrent validity for assessment of pain was supported for both scales. The modified FLACC showed construct validity for measuring pain.Relevance To Clinical PracticeThe use of validated scales may improve the assessment and management of pain and sedation in intubated children.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…