• Matthew Edward Smith, Annakan Navaratnam, Lily Jablenska, Panagiotis A Dimitriadis, and Rishi Sharma.
• Department of ENT Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
• Laryngoscope. 2015 Aug 1; 125 (8): 1816-21.

Objectives/HypothesisLife-threatening ear, nose, and throat (ENT) emergencies are uncommon but require immediate skilled management. We investigated if traditional lecture-based teaching can be improved by a simulation and lecture hybrid approach.Study DesignA single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial.MethodsTwo groups of interns with no previous ENT experience were randomized to one of two training groups: a simulation/lecture hybrid group or a lecture-only control group. Both groups received 90 minutes of training covering the assessment of critically ill patients and four ENT emergency topics. Both groups received the same initial lecture slides. The control group received additional slides, and the simulation group received simulated emergency scenario training using basic mannequins. Following the training, candidates were asked to provide feedback on their perception of training, and they were formally assessed with a standardized one-to-one viva.ResultsThirty-eight interns were recruited: 18 in the control group and 20 in the simulation group. The candidates in the simulation group performed significantly better in all viva situations (P < .05) and had better perception of learning (P < .05). Additionally, the simulation group was more likely to recommend the training to a colleague (P < .05).ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that replacing traditional lecture-based training with a mixture of lectures and emergency scenario simulation is more effective at preparing junior doctors for ENT emergencies, and better met their learning needs. Implementing this kind of teaching is feasible with a minimum of additional resources or time.Level Of Evidence1b© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

16 keywords...

hide…