• Lancet · Jul 2021

    Associations between stressful working conditions and psychosomatic symptoms among Palestinian nurses: a cross-sectional survey.

    • Yousef Jaradat, Espen Bjertness, Birkeland NielsenMortenMDepartment of Work Psychology and Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway., and Rita Bast-Pettersen.
    • Department of Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: jaradat.you@gmail.com.
    • Lancet. 2021 Jul 1; 398 Suppl 1: S33.

    BackgroundStressful working conditions among nurses have adverse effects on their physical and mental health. We investigated associations between self-reported stressful working conditions and psychosomatic symptoms among nurses in the Hebron district, occupied Palestinian Territory, and whether there are differences the sexes in the perceptions of working conditions and psychosomatic symptoms.MethodsWe did a cross-sectional survey between Oct 7 and Dec 10, 2012, among registered nurses in all health sectors in Hebron district. A nine-point ordinal scale of working conditions was used to categorise perception of stress as low, medium, or high, and seven psychosomatic symptoms were recorded on a checklist coded as never (0), seldom (1), occasionally (2), or often (3), allowing for a total score between 0 and 21. All analyses were done with STATA (version 10). P values of less than 0·05 were significant. Participation in the study was voluntary, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, Norway. Permission to do the study was obtained from the Palestinian Ministry of Health.FindingsAmong 372 eligible nurses, ten were on extended leave from work, 16 declined to participate, and four had incomplete data, giving a final sample of 342 nurses (92% response rate). 212 (62%) were women and 130 (38%) were men. Low levels of stress were reported by 42 (12%) nurses, medium levels by 206 (60%), and high levels by 94 (28%). The mean score of psychosomatic symptoms for the group was 10·4 (SD 4·02, range 0-21). Scores did not differ significantly between men and women. Mean symptom scores differed between nurses with self-reported highly stressful working conditions and those with low levels of stress (12.6 vs 8.4, difference 4·1, 95% CI 2·7-5·5; p<0·001). Among male nurses, those with self-reported highly stressful working conditions had a mean psychosomatic symptom score of 13.0, compared with that was 7.7 among those working in low-stress conditions (difference 5·3 units, p<0·001). This effect remained significant after adjustment for the covariates age, education, number of children, work schedule, and years of experience (12·6 vs 7·7, difference 4·9 units, 95% CI 2·6-7·2). Among female nurses, the scores among those with high-stress working conditions was 12.4 and for those with low-stress working conditions was 9.0 (difference 3·4 units, p<0·001). After adjustment the difference remained similar (12·4 vs 9·0, difference 3·5 units, 95% CI 1·7-5·3, p<0·001).InterpretationWe found that psychosomatic symptoms increased as self-reported perception of stressful working conditions increased, irrespective of sex. The study had a cross-sectional design and both exposure and outcomes were measured using self-report and, therefore, interpretation of the results should be made with caution. Longitudinal epidemiological studies are recommended. Future studies should investigate whether stressful working conditions affect the quality of patients' care in health services.FundingNorwegian Programme for Development, Research and Education.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.