• H-J Wilke.
• Institut für Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik, Zentrum für Muskuloskelettale Forschung Ulm (ZMFU), Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 14, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland. hans-joachim.wilke@uni-ulm.de.
• Unfallchirurg. 2015 Oct 1; 118 (10): 822830822-30.

BackgroundWith increasing age, bone mass decreases and the structure of the cancellous bone in the vertebral body changes. Especially in osteoporotic patients, but also with metastases in the vertebral body, this leads to decreased strength and, thus, to an increased risk of vertebral fractures. It is expected that this problem will increase significantly because of demographic developments. To treat or to prevent such vertebral fractures, different augmentation techniques have been developed. They can mainly be divided into vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty procedures.PurposeThe goal of this paper is to summarize biomechanical aspects of these augmentations procedures and to present some alternative methods.Materials And MethodsWith vertebroplasty, the loss of bone mass is balanced by injecting bone cement which improves the failure strength of the affected vertebral body. With kyphoplasty, cavities are created and these are filled with bone cement.ResultsDisadvantages of vertebroplasty are uncontrollable cement extrusion and increased fracture risk in the adjacent vertebral bodies. With balloon kyphoplasty, the adjacent cancellous bone is compacted during dilation and, thus, does not allow good integration with the remaining trabeculae. In addition, this method is associated with an increased risk of fracture in the adjacent vertebrae. To counter these disadvantages, a number of new types of cement and alternative augmentation methods are being developed, with which the vertebral body may be filled or distracted.ConclusionThe efficacy of these new methods should be tested in appropriate experimental biomechanical studies before they are used in patients.

21 keywords...

hide…