• Int J Obes (Lond) · May 2017

    Comparative Study

    Prediction and evaluation of resting energy expenditure in a large group of obese outpatients.

    • M Marra, I Cioffi, R Sammarco, C Montagnese, M Naccarato, V Amato, F Contaldo, and F Pasanisi.
    • Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Interuniversity Centre for Obesity and Eating Disorders (CISRODCA), Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
    • Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 May 1; 41 (5): 697-705.

    Background/ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare resting energy expenditure (REE) measured (MREE) by indirect calorimetry (IC) and REE predicted (PREE) from established predictive equations in a large sample of obese Caucasian adults.Subjects/MethodsWe evaluated 1851 obese patients (body mass index (BMI)>30 kg m-2) aged between 18a and 65 years. Data were obtained by comparing MREE with PREE, derived from different equations, within and between normal weight and obese groups. The mean differences between PREE and MREE as well as the accuracy prediction within ±10% level were investigated in the whole sample and in three subgroups, classified by BMI (Group 1=30-39.9 kg m-2; Group 2=40-49.9 kg m-2; Group 3>50 kg m-2).ResultsWe observed that FAO, Henry and Muller3 (body composition (BC)) equations provided good mean PREE-MREE (bias -0.7, -0.3 and 0.9%; root mean standard error (RMSE) 273, 263 and 269 kcal per day, respectively); HB and Henry equations were more accurate individually (57 and 56.9%). Only the Muller1 (BC) equation gave the lowest PREE-MREE difference (bias -1.7%; RMSE 228 kcal per day) in females, while Johnstone and De Lorenzo equations were the most accurate (55.1 and 54.8%). When the sample was split into three subgroups according to BMI, no differences were found in males; however, the majority of the equations included in this study failed to estimate REE in severely obese females (BMI>40 kg m-2). Overall, prediction accuracy was low (~55%) for all predictive equations, regardless of BMI.ConclusionsDifferent established equations can be used for estimating REE at the population level in both sexes. However, the accuracy was very low for all predictive equations used, particularly among females and when BMI was high, limiting their use in clinical practice. Our findings suggest that the validation of new predictive equations would improve the accuracy of REE prediction, especially for severely obese subjects (BMI>40 kg m-2).

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.