• U Shivaram, M E Cash, F Mateo, and C Shim.
• Department of Medicine, V.A. Medical Center, SUNY, Health Science Center at Brooklyn, USA.
• Respir Med. 1997 Jul 1; 91 (6): 327-34.

AbstractExercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients treated with oral aminophylline may be different from those treated with high-dose inhaled ipratropium bromide. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of therapeutic doses of oral aminophylline with high-dose ipratropium bromide on spirometry and exercise tolerance. The study was conducted on three consecutive days in a double-blind, randomized, crossover fashion. Baseline studies obtained on each study day included vital signs, simple spirometry and a symptom-limited maximal cardiopulmonary stress test, after which patients received one of the following treatments on each day: Treatment 1, inhaled ipratropium (total dose of 144 micrograms) with placebo tablets; Treatment 2, inhaled placebo with oral aminophylline (400 mg); Treatment 3, inhaled placebo and placebo tablets. Simple spirometry was repeated at 60 and 120 min after baseline. Vital signs and cardiopulmonary stress testing was repeated at 120 min. Eighteen patients were enrolled in the study, and 17 of these completed the study. There was a significant (P < 0.05) increase in both forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), from 0.75 (0.21) to 0.92 (0.3), and forced vital capacity (FVC), from 1.8 (0.79) to 2.11 (0.84), with high-dose ipratropium despite prior beta-agonist therapy. Lack of improvement in exercise capacity was noted with ipratropium despite improvement in spirometry. These results suggest that elderly patients with severe COPD may have exercise limitation that is not directly dependent on severity of airflow obstruction. Ipratropium bromide and aminophylline demonstrated no acute effects on exercise capacity.

29 keywords...

hide…