• Luis Baez-Vallecillo, Akshara S Raghavendra, Kenneth R Hess, Carlos H Barcenas, Stacy L Moulder, Debu Tripathy, Vicente Valero, and Rashmi K Murthy.
• Division of Cancer Medicine - Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
• Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019 Jul 1; 176 (1): 227-234.

PurposeLapatinib (L) is approved in combination with capecitabine or letrozole for patients with trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is no efficacy data of L in patients who received prior pertuzumab (P) and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), now included as standard first- and second-line therapies, respectively. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of L in a contemporary patient population that received prior P and/or T-DM1.MethodsWe identified patients with HER2-positive MBC who received L (n = 520) between 2003 and 2017 at MD Anderson Cancer Center and selected a target cohort who received L after prior P or T-DM1 (n = 43) with the remaining included in the comparison cohort (n = 477). We evaluated outcome measures including clinical benefit rate (CBR), best tumor response (BTR), duration on L, and time to progression (TTP). Survival analyses used Kaplan-Meier statistics.ResultsCBR was 28% (95% CI 10-32) for the target cohort and 40% (95% CI 36-45) for the comparison cohort. The median duration on L was 5 months (95% CI 3.0-9.0) in the target cohort and 6.7 months (5.9-8.0) in the comparison cohort. In both cohorts, the median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were longer in patients with de novo metastatic disease compared to patients with disease recurrence.ConclusionL-based therapy is an active therapeutic option and remains a viable option for HER2 + MBC after prior trastuzumab, P and/or T-DM1.

40 keywords...

hide…