• Surgical infections · Oct 2015

    Comparative Study

    Adverse Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization Associated with Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Infections after Elective Surgery.

    • Rebecca S Campbell, Matthew F Emons, Jack Mardekian, Doug Girgenti, Michael Gaffney, and Holly Yu.
    • 1 Cerner Research , Culver City, California.
    • Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Oct 1; 16 (5): 543-52.

    BackgroundCurrent studies of post-operative Staphylococcus aureus disease focus primarily on surgical site infections and are often limited to infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The objective of this retrospective cohort analysis was to describe the occurrence of and outcomes associated with post-operative MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) infections in patients undergoing elective surgical procedures.MethodsData were extracted from Health Facts for inpatients aged 18 years or older with pre-defined International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes, meeting additional criteria indicating that the procedure was elective. Post-operative S. aureus infection was identified by one or more qualifying culture positive for MRSA or MSSA. Multivariable regression models compared patients with MRSA, MSSA, and no S. aureus infection.ResultsAmong 34,866 qualifying patients, the incidence of S. aureus infections was 0.9% during the index admission and 1.7% within 90 d after elective surgery, of which 36.6% and 38.4% were MRSA, respectively. The highest rates were observed among patients undergoing general surgery (2.2% during index admission, 3.2% within 90 d) and plastic surgery (1.8% during index admission, 3.1% within 90 d). Patients with MRSA and MSSA experienced poorer outcomes than uninfected patients, based on index admission length of stay (LOS; mean, 30.2, 22.7, and 5.7 d, respectively), hospital charges ($165,651, $134,313, and $52,077), and hospital mortality (odds ratios, 6.4 for MRSA, 4.8 for MSSA versus uninfected patients). Relative to MSSA infection, MRSA infection was associated with greater total hospital LOS and hospital charges but not with increased re-admission or mortality.ConclusionsThe burden of post-operative S. aureus infection is shared among elective surgical procedures, however, rates and types of infections vary. Whereas MRSA infection results in substantially greater health care cost and LOS, mortality and re-admission rates are similar among patients with MRSA and MSSA. In elective surgery, infection control and surveillance for both MRSA and MSSA are warranted.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.