• J Magn Reson Imaging · Nov 1991

    Comparative Study

    Bowel disease: prospective comparison of CT and 1.5-T pre- and postcontrast MR imaging with T1-weighted fat-suppressed and breath-hold FLASH sequences.

    • R C Semelka, J P Shoenut, R Silverman, M A Kroeker, C S Yaffe, and A B Micflikier.
    • Department of Radiology, St Boniface General Hospital MRI Facility, Winnipeg, Man, Canada.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991 Nov 1; 1 (6): 625-32.

    AbstractThe potential of new high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences to evaluate bowel disease was investigated and compared with computed tomographic (CT) studies. Thirty-two patients were studied, 14 with known or suspected gastrointestinal tumors and 18 with known or suspected bowel inflammatory conditions. T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin-echo and breath-hold FLASH (fast low-angle shot) images were obtained before and after intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine. Pathologic confirmation was obtained by biopsy (n = 18), surgical excision (n = 8), or endoscopy (n = 6). CT and MR images were analyzed separately in a prospective fashion and reviewed by consensus. Information from CT and MR images was comparable in cases of confirmed bowel neoplasia. CT scans had better spatial resolution, while fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced MR images had better contrast resolution. In the 18 cases of bowel inflammation, CT scans showed concentric wall thickening in 16, while MR images showed concentric wall thickening in 14 and increased contrast enhancement in 17. Contrast enhancement was better appreciated on fat-suppressed images than on FLASH images. The results suggest that MR imaging may play a role in the evaluation of bowel disease.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.