• Investigative radiology · Jul 2013

    Highly accelerated T1-weighted abdominal imaging using 2-dimensional controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration: a comparison with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions parallel imaging.

    • Philipp Riffel, Ulrike I Attenberger, Stephan Kannengiesser, Marcel D Nickel, Carolyn Arndt, Mathias Meyer, Stefan O Schoenberg, and Henrik J Michaely.
    • Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. Philipp.Riffel@umm.de
    • Invest Radiol. 2013 Jul 1; 48 (7): 554-61.

    PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and technical quality of an abdominal 3-dimensional interpolated breath-hold (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) magnetic resonance examination using the new parallel acquisition technique, controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA).Materials And MethodsIn this institutional review board-approved study, 15 volunteers underwent an abdominal magnetic resonance imaging examination including axial unenhanced 3-dimensional VIBE sequences with the conventional parallel acquisition technique, generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions parallel imaging (GRAPPA), with an acceleration factor (R) of 2, 3, 4, and 2 × 2 in comparison with a CAIPIRINHA-VIBE sequence with an acceleration factor of 2 × 2. Images were evaluated regarding the overall image quality, liver edge sharpness, and parallel imaging artifacts. Signal-to-noise ratio was evaluated using 2 different methods. In a second study population, 17 patients were examined with our new routine protocol for abdominal imaging that now comprises VIBE sequences with CAIPIRINHA with R = 2 × 2.ResultsIn the volunteer population, the overall image quality of CAIPIRINHA with R = 2 × 2 was significantly higher compared with GRAPPA with R = 3, 4, and 2 × 2 (P < 0.05). There were significantly less parallel imaging artifacts with CAIPIRINHA with R = 2 × 2 (P < 0.05). Acquisition time varied between 21.1 (GRAPPA with R = 2, 320 matrix) and 6.9 seconds (CAIPIRINHA with R = 2 × 2, 256 matrix). Signal-to-noise ratio performance of CAIPIRINHA with R = 2 × 2 was superior to GRAPPA with R = 3, 4, and 2 × 2. In the patient population, VIBE sequences with CAIPIRINHA with R = 2 × 2 showed consistently good image quality, minimal motion artifacts, and minimal parallel imaging artifacts.ConclusionsThe CAIPRINHA-VIBE with an acceleration factor of R = 2 × 2 is feasible in a clinical setting and is characterized by fast and robust imaging with an image quality comparable with a 2-fold acceleration with GRAPPA.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…