• Critical care medicine · May 1995

    Comparative Study

    Evaluation of a new continuous thermodilution cardiac output monitor in critically ill patients: a prospective criterion standard study.

    • M Haller, C Zöllner, J Briegel, and H Forst.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, FRG.
    • Crit. Care Med. 1995 May 1;23(5):860-6.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of a new continuous cardiac output monitor (one based on the thermodilution principle) in critically ill patients.DesignCriterion standard study.SettingMultidisciplinary intensive care unit in a university hospital.PatientsFourteen critically ill patients, with different diseases, requiring pulmonary artery catheterization.InterventionsIn two patients with a left ventricular assist system, a defined, sudden 1 L/min change in cardiac output was carried through to evaluate the in vivo response time of the continuous cardiac output monitoring system. In the remaining 12 patients, cardiac output was altered by varying the dose of catecholamines, by volume loading, or by varying the level of sedation. In four patients, a rapid infusion of cold saline was given through a central venous catheter to test the performance of the system under these conditions.Measurements And Main ResultsCardiac output was monitored continuously. A total of 163 (13 to 18 per patient) bolus determinations of cardiac output were performed, using the conventional thermodilution technique and simultaneously using the indocyanine green dye dilution technique. The range of cardiac output was 3.8 to 15.6 L/min. The results of the continuous thermodilution method were compared with the results of the bolus thermodilution and the dye dilution methods, respectively. The mean difference (bias) +/- SD of differences (precision) was 0.35 +/- 1.01 L/min for continuous vs. bolus thermodilution and 0.34 +/- 1.01 L/min for continuous thermodilution vs. indocyanine green dye dilution. Linear regression (correlation) analyses were y = 0.95x + 0.76 (r2 = .91) for continuous and bolus thermodilution and y = 0.93x + 0.87 (r2 = .91) for continuous thermodilution and dye dilution. The 75% in vivo response time was 10.5 mins. The infusion of cold isotonic saline led to erroneous continuous cardiac output values. When the conventional bolus thermodilution and dye dilution techniques were compared, mean difference was -0.01 +/- 0.54 L/min and the results of linear regression analyses were y = 0.97x + 0.22 (r2 = .97).ConclusionsContinuous cardiac output measurement using the thermodilution technique is reasonably accurate and is reliable and applicable in routine clinical practice, and therefore may add to patient safety. However, the response time is too slow for the immediate detection of acute changes in cardiac output. Some clinical conditions such as the rapid infusion of cold solutions can interfere with the continuous cardiac output measurement. Conventional bolus thermodilution and indocyanine green dye dilution methods showed good agreement and can be used interchangeably.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…