• Silvia S Martins, William Ponicki, Nathan Smith, Ariadne Rivera-Aguirre, Corey S Davis, David S Fink, Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia, Stephen G Henry, MarshallBrandon D LBDLDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States., Paul Gruenewald, and Magdalena Cerdá.
• Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: ssm2183@cumc.columbia.edu.
• Int. J. Drug Policy. 2019 Dec 1; 74: 174-180.

BackgroundPrescription drug monitoring programs (PDMP), by reducing access to prescribed opioids (POs), may contribute to a policy environment in which some people with opioid dependence are at increased risk for transitioning from POs to heroin/other illegal opioids. This study examines how PDMP adoption and changes in the characteristics of PDMPs over time contribute to changes in fatal heroin poisoning in counties within states from 2002 to 2016.MethodsLatent transition analysis to classify PDMPs into latent classes (Cooperative, Proactive, and Weak) for each state and year, across three intervals (1999-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2016). We examined the association between probability of PDMP latent class membership and the rate of county-level heroin poisoning death.ResultsAfter adjustment for potential county-level confounders and co-occurring policy changes, adoption of a PDMP was significantly associated with increased heroin poisoning rates (22% increase by third year post-adoption). Findings varied by PDMP type. From 2010-2016, states with Cooperative PDMPs (those more likely to share data with other states, to require more frequent reporting, and include more drug schedules) had 19% higher heroin poisoning rates than states with Weak PDMPs (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.14, 1.25). States with Proactive PDMPs (those more likely to report outlying prescribing and dispensing and provide broader access to law enforcement) had 6% lower heroin poisoning rates than states with No/Weak PDMPs (ARR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.90, 0.98).ConclusionThere is a consistent, positive association between state PDMP adoption and heroin poisoning mortality. However, this varies by PDMP type, with Proactive PDMPs associated with a small reduction in heroin poisoning deaths. This raises questions about the potential for PDMPs to support efforts to decrease heroin overdose risk, particularly by using proactive alerts to identify patients in need of treatment for opioid use disorder. Future research on mechanisms explaining the reduction in heroin poisonings after enactment of Proactive PDMPs is merited.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…