-
- Susan M Kealey, Todd Aho, David Delong, Daniel P Barboriak, James M Provenzale, and James D Eastwood.
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710, USA. keale001@mc.duke.edu
- Radiology. 2005 May 1; 235 (2): 569-74.
PurposeTo determine prospectively the diffusibility of water in normal lumbar disks in adults by using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and to determine if a relationship exists between disk ADC and magnetic resonance (MR) findings of disk degeneration.Materials And MethodsThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and all participants gave written informed consent prior to enrollment. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the lumbar spine was performed in 39 patients (all men; mean age, 53 years) and five volunteers (all men; mean age, 31 years). ADC values were recorded for each disk. All disks were visually graded by two independent observers as being normal or as showing at least one of three MR findings of degeneration on sagittal T2-weighted images. Mean ADC values of normal disks were compared with those of degenerated disks and were correlated with age and anatomic location. Data were analyzed by using Kendall correlation statistics, Mantel-Haenszel statistics, and a paired two-tailed Student t test.ResultsThe mean ADC value was 2.27 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.58 (+/- standard deviation) in normal disks and 2.06 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.47 in abnormal disks (9% reduction, P = .006). A statistically significant dependence of lumbar disk ADC on anatomic location was reported (analysis of variance, P < .001), with lower ADC values seen in more caudal disks. There was no association between age and mean disk ADC.ConclusionA statistically significant decrease was seen in the ADC values of degenerated lumbar disks when compared with ADC values of normal disks. More caudal disks, even when normal, showed lower ADC values than more cephalic disks.(c) RSNA, 2005.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.