-
Neuroscience letters · Jan 2012
Comparative StudyA direct comparison of affective pain processing underlying two traditional pain modalities in rodents.
- C T McNabb, M L Uhelski, and P N Fuchs.
- The University of Texas at Arlington, Department of Psychology, 501 S. Nedderman Dr., 313 Life Sciences Building, Box 19528, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
- Neurosci. Lett. 2012 Jan 17; 507 (1): 57-61.
AbstractIn the preclinical study of pain, two commonly used pain models are the L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL) and the injection of carrageenan. Using a modified place escape/avoidance paradigm (mPEAP), a novel behavioral test that quantifies aversive behavior evoked by painful stimuli, we directly compared the affective component of the SNL and inflammation models. Fifty three Sprague-Dawley rats underwent baseline mechanical paw withdrawal threshold (MPWT) and mPEAP testing followed by an L5 SNL or sham surgery for the left paw and then a carrageenan or saline injection for the right paw. After recovering, animals underwent post-manipulation MPWT and mPEAP tests. Both pain conditions produced mechanical hypersensitivity, and animals with a single-paw condition demonstrated escape/avoidance behavior in response to stimulation of the affected paw. Animals with the bilateral pain condition did not show a preference for stimulation of one paw versus the other paw, and the avoidance behavior was not significantly different from the sham/saline control. The results indicate that the pain models are associated with significant avoidance behavior and that they produce comparable degrees of pain affect. These findings advance the preclinical study of pain by validating the simultaneous utilization of the SNL and inflammation models and will allow future studies that combine pain conditions to more closely resemble clinical conditions.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.