• Chee Khoon Lee, Clare Scott, Geoffrey J Lindeman, Anne Hamilton, Elizabeth Lieschke, Emma Gibbs, Rebecca Asher, Heath Badger, Robin Paterson, Lauren Macnab, Edmond Michael Kwan, Prudence A Francis, Frances Boyle, and Michael Friedlander.
• St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. chee.lee@ctc.usyd.edu.au.
• Br. J. Cancer. 2019 Feb 1; 120 (3): 279-285.

BackgroundWe conducted a Phase 1 study to evaluate safety and activity of olaparib tablets and oral cyclophosphamide.MethodsPatients had metastatic breast cancer (BC) or recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), performance status 0-2, and ≤3 lines of prior therapy. Patients were treated using a dose escalation strategy with cohort expansion once maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. Dose level 1 (DL1): olaparib 300 mg bid, cyclophosphamide 50 mg on days 1, 3, and 5, weekly. DL2: olaparib 300 mg bid, cyclophosphamide 50 mg, days 1-5 weekly.ResultsOf 32 patients, 23 had HGSOC (germline BRCA mutation [gBRCAm] 70%) and 9 had BC (gBRCAm 67%). Four were treated at DL1 and 28 at DL2, the MTD. Haematological adverse events (AEs) were most common: grade 3/4 AEs: lymphopenia 75%, anaemia 31%, neutropenia 37%, thrombocytopenia 47%. Two permanently discontinued treatment due to haematological AEs. In BC, no objective response was reported. Unconfirmed objective response was 48% and 64% for all HGSOC and gBRCAm subset, respectively. CA125 responses were 70% (all HGSOC) and 92% (gBRCAm).ConclusionsIn HGSOC and BC, olaparib 300 mg bid and cyclophosphamide 50 mg on days 1-5 weekly were tolerable and active, particularly in gBRCAm, and is worthy of further investigation.

40 keywords...

hide…