• Academic radiology · Oct 2012

    Comparative Study

    Liver fat quantification by dual-echo MR imaging outperforms traditional histopathological analysis.

    • Michael A Fischer, Dimitri A Raptis, Matteo Montani, Rolf Graf, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Daniel Nanz, Hatem Alkadhi, and Hans Scheffel.
    • Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistraße 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland. michaelalexander.fischer@usz.ch
    • Acad Radiol. 2012 Oct 1; 19 (10): 1208-14.

    Rationale And ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dual-echo (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without fat and water separation for the quantification of liver fat content (LFC) in vitro and in patients undergoing liver surgery, with comparison to histopathologic analysis.Materials And MethodsMRI was performed on a 1.5-T scanner using a three-dimensional DE MRI sequence with automated reconstruction of in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) and fat-signal-only and water-signal-only images. LFC was estimated by fat fractions from IP and OP images (MRI(IP/OP)) and from Dixon-based fat-only and water-only images (MRI(DIxON)). Seven phantoms containing a titrated mixture of liver and fat from 0% to 50% were examined. Forty-three biopsies in 22 patients undergoing liver surgery were prospectively evaluated by a pathologist by traditional determination of the cell-count fraction and by a computer-based algorithm, the latter serving as the reference standard.ResultsIn vitro, both MRI(IP/OP) and MRI(DIxON) were significantly correlated with titrated LFC (r = 0.993, P < .001), with a smaller measurement bias for MRI(IP/OP) (+2.6%) than for MRI(DIxON) (+4.5%). In vivo, both MRI(IP/OP) and MRI(DIxON) from DE MRI were correlated significantly better with computer-based histologic results (P < .001) and showed significantly smaller measurement bias (4.8% vs 21.1%) compared to histologic cell-count fraction (P < .001). Measurement bias was significantly smaller for MRI(IP/OP) than for MRI(DIxON) (P < .001).ConclusionsDE MRI allows the accurate quantification of LFC in a surgical population, outperforming traditional histopathologic analysis. DE MRI without fat and water separation shows the highest accuracy and smallest measurement bias for the quantification of LFC.Copyright © 2012 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…