• BJOG · Oct 2004

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    A randomised double-blind comparison of epidural fentanyl versus fentanyl and bupivicaine for pain relief in the second stage of labour.

    • S W Lindow, A R Dhillon, S W Husaini, and I F Russell.
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women and Children's Hospital, Hull Royal Infirmary, The University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
    • BJOG. 2004 Oct 1;111(10):1075-80.

    ObjectivesTo compare the effectiveness of two different methods for epidural analgesia in the second stage of labour-fentanyl alone versus the usual mixture of bupivicaine and fentanyl.DesignA double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.SettingAn English maternity hospital.SampleEighty nulliparous women in the second stage of labour.MethodsAfter successful institution of epidural analgesia with a continuous infusion of bupivicaine/fentanyl mixture in the first stage of labour, the patients were randomised at full dilatation to receive either continuation of the same solution or a change to a fentanyl-only solution given at the same rate.Main Outcome MeasuresMode of delivery, duration of the second stage and quality of analgesia.ResultsThere was no difference in the number of instrumental deliveries (30%vs 27.5%) or the duration of the second stage (141 vs 147 minutes) between the bupivicaine/fentanyl and fentanyl groups, respectively. The bupivicaine/fentanyl group demonstrated a lower need for rescue epidural analgesia (1 vs 6, RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02-1.3) and significantly fewer high pain scores (11 vs 20, RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.0).ConclusionSecond stage epidural analgesia with fentanyl did not alter delivery outcomes or labour duration but resulted in poorer analgesia.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.