-
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Jul 2007
Radiation pneumonitis: local dose versus [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake response in irradiated lung.
- Thomas Guerrero, Valen Johnson, Justin Hart, Tinsu Pan, Meena Khan, Dershan Luo, Zhongxing Liao, Jaffer Ajani, Craig Stevens, and Ritsuko Komaki.
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA. tguerrero@mdanderson.org
- Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007 Jul 15; 68 (4): 1030-5.
PurposeTo quantify the relationship between the local radiation dose received and the posttreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the lung.Methods And MaterialsThe data from 36 patients treated for esophageal cancer with thoracic radiotherapy who underwent restaging PET/CT imaging between 4 and 12 weeks after radiotherapy completion were evaluated. Their treatment planning CT was registered with the restaging PET/CT. Using histogram analysis, the voxel average FDG-PET uptake vs. radiation dose was obtained for each case. Hierarchical linear regression models for each patient were applied to study the variation in the linear trends between cases. Deviation of the dose-response curve from a linear model was tested.ResultsThe median time between radiotherapy completion and FDG-PET imaging was 40 days (range, 26-70 days). The median of the mean standard uptake value in the lung that received 0-5 Gy was 0.63 (range, 0.36-1.27), 5-10 Gy was 0.77 (range, 0.40-1.35), 10-20 Gy was 0.80 (range, 0.40-1.72), and >20 Gy was 1.08 (range, 0.44-2.63). A hierarchical linear regression model of the radiation dose and normalized FDG uptake per case found an adequate fit with the linear model, and the addition of quadratic and logarithmic functions did not improve the fit. The 36 cases had a posterior mean of slopes range of 0.0048-0.069.ConclusionThe regional dose vs. radiation pneumonitis response was evaluated with FDG-PET/CT imaging. Statistical modeling found a linear relationship. The slope of this relationship varied over an order of magnitude, reflecting the range of the underlying biological response to radiation among the study population.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.