• BJOG · Apr 2012

    Comparative Study

    Prolonged labour as indication for emergency caesarean section: a quality assurance analysis by criterion-based audit at two Tanzanian rural hospitals.

    • N Maaløe, B L Sorensen, R Onesmo, N J Secher, and I C Bygbjerg.
    • Department of International Health, Immunology, and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. nanna_maal@hotmail.com
    • BJOG. 2012 Apr 1; 119 (5): 605-13.

    ObjectiveTo audit the quality of obstetric management preceding emergency caesarean sections for prolonged labour.DesignA quality assurance analysis of a retrospective criterion-based audit supplemented by in-depth interviews with hospital staff.SettingTwo Tanzanian rural mission hospitals.PopulationAudit of 144 cases of women undergoing caesarean sections for prolonged labour; in addition, eight staff members were interviewed.MethodsCriteria of realistic best practice were established, and the case files were audited and compared with these. Hospital staff were interviewed about what they felt might be the causes for the audit findings.Main Outcome MeasuresPrevalence of suboptimal management and themes emerging from an analysis of the transcripts.ResultsSuboptimal management was identified in most cases. Non-invasive interventions to potentially avoid operative delivery were inadequately used. When deciding on caesarean section, in 26% of the cases labour was not prolonged, and in 16% the membranes were still intact. Of the women with genuine prolonged labour, caesarean sections were performed with a fully dilated cervix in 36% of the cases. Vacuum extraction was not considered. Amongst the hospital staff interviewed, the awareness of evidence-based guidelines was poor. Word of mouth, personal experience, and fear, especially of HIV transmission, influenced management decisions.ConclusionThe lack of use and awareness of evidence-based guidelines led to misinterpretation of clinical signs, fear of simple interventions, and an excessive rate of emergency caesarean sections.© 2012 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2012 RCOG.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.