• Pain · Jun 1982

    Comparative Study

    A comparison of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in chronic and acute pain.

    • Anthony E Reading.
    • Division of Behavioral Medicine, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California, 760 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, Calif. 90024 U.S.A.
    • Pain. 1982 Jun 1; 13 (2): 185-192.

    AbstractThe McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is widely used in pain research and treatment. The internal structure of the questionnaire has been subjected to empirical investigation, with sensory and reactive factors documented. In the present study, questionnaire responses of 95 women experiencing acute (post episiotomy) pain are analyzed. Episiotomy pain patients utilized sensory subgroups more frequently than comparison groups of women experiencing dysmenorrhea (n = 166) or chronic pelvic pain without obvious pathology (N = 31). Chronic pain patients used affective and reaction subgroups with greater frequency. The episiotomy/MPQ scores were subjected to factor analysis and 6 factors were derived, reflecting specific sensory qualities and combined emotional/sensory dimensions. The factor structure to emerge was less distinctive than previously reported on chronic pain patients. It is suggested that acute pain involves less differentiation of sensory, affective and evaluative language dimensions. Rating scales were also administered. Ratings of labor and episiotomy pain were uncorrelated indicating the importance of distinguishing between these in studying pain in the puerperium.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.