• P T Chui and E W Cheam.
• Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, NT, People's Republic of China.
• Anaesthesia. 1998 May 1;53(5):491-5.

AbstractNinety patients were assigned randomly in a double-blind manner to receive 0.9% sodium chloride, mivacurium 0.04 mg.kg-1 or mivacurium 0.08 mg.kg-1 intravenously, followed by propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1. A laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was inserted 90 s later. The LMA was positioned correctly during the first attempt in 87% of patients and this was not significantly altered by the use of mivacurium. However, mivacurium decreased the incidence of swallowing, coughing, movement and laryngospasm (p < 0.05). LMA insertion was graded as easy in 88% of patients who had mivacurium, compared with 50% in patients who had propofol alone (p < 0.05). The conditions during LMA insertion were similar after 0.04 or 0.08 mg.kg-1 of mivacurium. Patients were apnoeic for a mean (SD) time of 0.67 (0.72) min after propofol alone, compared with 1.72 (1.06) min and 3.05 (1.36) min in patients who also received mivacurium 0.04 and 0.08 mg.kg-1, respectively (p < 0.01). Patients who received mivacurium had a lower incidence of postoperative sore throat (24-30% vs. 53%) (p < 0.05). In conclusion, low-dose mivacurium facilitates LMA insertion and decreases the incidence of postoperative sore throat.

23 keywords...

hide…