-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
A dose-intensive, cyclophosphamide-based regimen for the treatment of recurrent/progressive or advanced solid tumors of childhood: a report from the Australia and New Zealand Children's Cancer Study Group.
- P A Carpenter, L White, G B McCowage, V Nayanar, I Toogood, P J Shaw, L Lockwood, and K Tiedemann.
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Sydney Children's Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
- Cancer. 1997 Aug 1; 80 (3): 489-96.
BackgroundChildren with solid tumors that progress or recur after conventional multimodality therapies have a very poor prognosis. In a pilot study, vincristine, etoposide, and dose-escalated cyclophosphamide (VETOPEC) was shown to be a promising salvage regimen. Continued accrual of patients and increased duration of follow-up has resulted in substantial experience with VETOPEC.MethodsBetween May 1991 and March 1994, 56 pediatric patients from 6 centers were enrolled in this study; 44 had recurrent or progressive tumors (Group A) and 12 had newly diagnosed, advanced tumors with a very poor prognosis (Group B). The VETOPEC regimen was comprised of vincristine, 0.05 mg/kg, on Days 1 and 14; etoposide, 2.5 mg/kg, on Days 1, 2, and 3; and fractionated, dose-escalated cyclophosphamide on Days 1, 2, and 3. The initial cyclophosphamide dose was 90 mg/kg (2.7 g/m2)/cycle with an escalation of 15 mg/kg/cycle in each subsequent cycle, to a maximum (over 6 cycles) of 165 mg/kg (5.0 g/m2)/cycle. Tumor response was evaluated every two to three cycles and included central review of imaging.ResultsThe combined and partial response rates for Groups A and B were 66% (25 of 38 patients) and 91% (10 of 11 patients), respectively. In Group A, best evaluable responses and event free (EF) survivors were observed with: brain tumors (7 of 9 patients; 2 EF at 39 and 45 months [mos], respectively), Wilms' tumor (6 of 7 patients; 3 EF at 37-49 mos), and lymphoma (4 of 4 patients; 2 EF at 52 and 59 mos, respectively); in Group B best evaluable responses and EF were observed with: neuroblastoma (5 of 6 patients; 1 disease free at 57 mos) and rhabdomyosarcoma (4 of 4 patients; no survivors). Hematologic toxicity was limiting despite support with myeloid growth factors in 33 patients. Four deaths in Group A and one in Group B were directly associated with this toxicity. Specifically, no cases of drug-related myocardial toxicity or pneumonitis were observed.ConclusionsThis chemotherapy regimen with its intense scheduling produced a high response rate and appreciable survival in patients with a variety of recurrent, progressive, or advanced solid tumors of childhood.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.