• Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. · Mar 2019

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Cardiotocography alone vs. cardiotocography with ST segment analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring in women with late-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial.

    • Alberto Puertas, Javier Góngora, Mercedes Valverde, Laura Revelles, Sebastian Manzanares, and M Paz Carrillo.
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital of Granada, Avda. Fuerzas Armadas s/n, 18014 Granada, Spain. Electronic address: apuertas51@hotmail.com.
    • Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2019 Mar 1; 234: 213-217.

    ObjectivesRandomized studies have obtained conflicting results regarding the usefulness of fetal electrocardiographic (ECG) ST-segment analysis, possibly because these studies included non-homogeneous populations. We designed a study to determine whether this monitoring technique is potentially useful for populations at risk for fetal heart rate alterations during labor, i.e. groups of women who share late-term pregnancy as a risk factor.Study DesignThis randomized clinical trial recruited women whose pregnancy had lasted more than 290 days. The participants were randomly assigned to continuous fetal cardiotocographic monitoring alone (CTG group) or with fetal ECG ST-segment analysis (ECG-F group). In the CTG group fetal heart rate was interpreted according to guidelines from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, whereas in the ECG-F group the tracings were interpreted according the original International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) guidelines. The primary outcome measure was neonatal outcome, evaluated as arterial blood pH in neonates after abdominal or vaginal operative delivery indicated because of nonreassuring fetal status.ResultsA total of 237 women were randomized, of whom 200 were included in the final analysis (100 in each group). The rate of cesarean delivery was the same in both groups (26%), and the rate of operative delivery due to nonreassuring fetal status did not differ significantly (38% in the CTG group vs. 39% in the ECG-F group). Regarding neonatal outcomes, there was no significant difference between groups in neonatal pH (7.27 [7.23-7.29] and 7.25 [7.21-7.27]).ConclusionsIn a population comprising only late-term pregnancies, fetal ECG monitoring had no benefits for the mother or fetus. Additional studies are needed of protocols for using ST waveform analysis in selected population groups.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.