• J Cardiovasc Magn Reson · Jan 2007

    Comparative Study

    Ultrafast time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D pulmonary venous cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using SENSE combined with CENTRA-keyhole.

    • Hermann Körperich, Jürgen Gieseke, Hermann Esdorn, Andreas Peterschröder, Romhild Hoogeveen, Peter Barth, Matthias Peuster, Hans Meyer, Samir Sarikouch, and Philipp Beerbaum.
    • Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany. hkoerperich@hdz-nrw.de
    • J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007 Jan 1; 9 (1): 77-87.

    PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic benefit of time-resolved CENTRA-keyhole contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CE-CMRA) for improving arterial-venous separation of pulmonary vessels.MethodsTwenty-three patients (18 males; age = 58 +/- 11y) after radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation to treat atrial fibrillation were examined using CENTRA-keyhole based multi-phase 3D CE-CMRA yielding 6 near-isotropic 3D datasets every 1.6 s (50-60 coronal partitions, 1.4 x 1.4 x 1.3 mm, SENSE-factor 3). Results were compared with conventional non-keyhole CE-CMRA (identical parameters, SENSE-factor 2).ResultsData acquisition was accelerated by a speedup factor of approximately 9 compared with the reference CE-CMRA (SENSE 1.5*, keyhole 6*). No pulmonary venous stenoses were detected by either method, overall pulmonary venous diameters were 17.1 +/- 3.6 mm. Applying Bland-Altman analysis, vessel diameters differed by a mean of 0.1 mm + 2.1 mm/-2.0 mm (mean +/- 2 SD), indicating close agreement between both techniques. Interobserver variability was higher for CENTRA-keyhole (mean = 0.1 mm; mean +/- 2 SD: +2.5 mm/-2.3 mm) compared to conventional technique (0.0 mm; +1.6 mm/-1.5 mm), corresponding to a percentual deviation (mean +/- 2 SD) of the mean diameter of approximately +/- 15% (keyhole CE-CMRA) and +/- 10% (conventional CE-CMRA), respectively. Using keyhole-based time-resolved CE-CMRA, the contrast between pulmonary veins versus aorta/pulmonary artery was significantly increased (p < 0.05), which improved vessel depiction. In 12 cases, the contrast bolus arrival was delayed in one of the pulmonary veins by 1 dynamic frame (= 1.6 seconds); in 7 cases by 2 frames (= 3.2 seconds) and in 1 subject by 3 frames (= 4.8 seconds). The bolus usually appeared first in the upper right pulmonary vein whereas a delay occurred most often in the lower left pulmonary vein.ConclusionsConventional CE-CMRA may be advantageous for accurate vessel size measures as evidenced by superior interobserver reproducibility in this study. Multi-dynamic CE-CMRA using CENTRA-keyhole with SENSE, however, allows for improved arterio-venous separation of pulmonary vessels and additional dynamical information on pulmonary venous perfusion, while maintaining high spatial resolution. Exact bolus timing is no longer needed.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…