-
- Tetsuro Tominaga, Takashi Akiyoshi, Noriko Yamamoto, Koji Oba, Toshiya Nagasaki, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Yosuke Fukunaga, and Masashi Ueno.
- Gastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
- Surgery. 2019 Dec 1; 166 (6): 1061-1067.
BackgroundThe prognostic value of classifying the degree of metastatic lymph node regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains unclear. The aim was to assess the prognostic value of lymph node regression grade in patients with rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.MethodsWe reviewed a total of 421 patients with rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy. All lymph nodes were examined retrospectively for evidence of response to chemoradiotherapy, and lymph node regression grade was scored as lymph node regression grade 0 (normal lymph node), lymph node regression grade 1 (100% fibrosis), lymph node regression grade 2 (< 25% cancer cells), lymph node regression grade 3 (25%-50% cancer cells), lymph node regression grade 4 (50%-75% cancer cells), and lymph node regression grade 5 (> 75% cancer cells). The prognostic importance of lymph node regression grade was evaluated.ResultsAmong 301 ypN0 patients, 27 patients were scored as lymph node regression grade 1. The 5-year recurrence-free survival and local recurrence rates in lymph node regression grade 1 patients were similar to those in lymph node regression grade 0 patients (96.3% versus 88.1% in recurrence-free survival and 0% versus 2.7% in local recurrence); however, among 120 ypN+ (lymph node regression grade 2-5) patients, the 5-year recurrence-free survival and local recurrence rates were poor regardless of the lymph node regression grade score (38.1%-61.1% in recurrence-free survival and 8.4%-14.0% in local recurrence). In the multivariate analysis, an intensified regimen using systemic chemotherapy was independently associated with more lymph node regression grade 1 (P < .001; odds ratio, 6.06; 95% confidence interval, 2.33-16.20) among patients with lymph node regressions grade 1 through 5. Furthermore, in the multivariate analysis, ypT3-4 (hazard ratio, 7.82; 95% confidence interval, 2.80-27.32; P < .001), lymph node regression grade 1 (hazard ratio, 0.048; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.27; P < .001), the number of retrieved lymph nodes < 12 (hazard ratio, 5.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-16.38; P = .014), and no perioperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 3.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-5.68; P = .002) were independent predictors of recurrence-free survival.ConclusionComplete lymph node regression after chemoradiotherapy is a strong prognostic factor in rectal cancer.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.