• Eur J Surg Oncol · Sep 2001

    Comparative Study

    A long-term review of the treatment of patients with Ewing's sarcoma in one institution.

    • M Sluga, R Windhager, S Lang, H Heinzl, P Krepler, F Mittermayer, M Dominkus, A Zoubek, and R Kotz.
    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. maria.sluga@akh-wien.ac.at
    • Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001 Sep 1; 27 (6): 569-73.

    AimsThe treatment of patients suffering from Ewing's sarcoma has changed over the last three decades. We report the analyses, significant prognostic factors, interdisciplinary approach and development of therapy in one institution in Austria.MethodsOne hundred and forty-two patients treated for Ewing's sarcoma between 1949 and 1994 were reviewed. Median follow-up was 8.5 years. Fifty-six patients were treated between 1949 and 1980 (group 1), and 86 patients between 1981 and 1994 (group 2). Patients in group 1 were treated with polychemotherapy. Patients in group 2 were treated with a neoadjuvant CESS (Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study) regimen. In group 1, 24 patients underwent biopsy only, 32 patients had a definitive operation, 48 patients received either radiation therapy only or additional radiation therapy compared with in group 2: 6, 80 and 44 cases, respectively.ResultsFive-year overall survival (OS) increased from 27% to 57%. Significant prognostic factors for OS were pre-operative metastases (P=0.0001), tumour location (P=0.0048), type of chemotherapy (P=0.002) and response to chemotherapy (P=0.0004). Chemotherapy (P=0.037), tumour location (P=0.0017) and metastases at diagnosis (P=0.0025) were significant.ConclusionThe most effective treatment of Ewing's sarcoma is chemotherapy.Copyright 2001 Harcourt Publishers Limited.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.