• Clinical nuclear medicine · Aug 2012

    Revisiting the clinical value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinomas: correlation with histology, serum CA-125 assay, and conventional radiological modalities.

    • Lidija Antunovic, Marino Cimitan, Eugenio Borsatti, Tanja Baresic, Roberto Sorio, Giorgio Giorda, Agostino Steffan, Luca Balestreri, Rosa Tatta, Giovanna Pepe, Domenico Rubello, Diego Cecchin, and Vincenzo Canzonieri.
    • Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy. lidija.antunovic@humanitas.it
    • Clin Nucl Med. 2012 Aug 1; 37 (8): e184-8.

    ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of 18F-FDG PET/CT in suspected recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer, after treatment, comparing outcomes of PET/CT with histological tumor subtype, CA-125 serum levels, and findings of conventional diagnostic imaging modalities (CI).MethodsData from 121 women who underwent FDG PET/CT for suspected recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer after treatment were reviewed retrospectively.ResultsOf all patients, 80% had recurrent disease and 20% were disease-free on the final clinical diagnosis. PET/CT showed true-positive findings in 82% of patients, whereas CI demonstrated true-positives in 70% of cases. At the time of PET/CT scanning, only 55 patients had serum CA-125 level greater than 35 U/mL, whereas 52 patients presented with CA-125 levels in a reference range. PET/CT sensitivity (82%) was significantly higher than that of CA-125 (59%), whereas difference in sensitivity between PET/CT and CI (69%) was limited. PET/CT specificity (87%) was significantly better than that of CI (47%), although no difference in specificity between PET/CT and CA-125 (80%) was found. However, no difference in CA-125 serum levels between patients with local tumor relapse and those with distant metastases was found. PET/CT showed the highest positive predictive value (96%) and negative predictive value (55%) when compared with other modalities. In high-grade tumors (n = 66), PET/CT accuracy was 80%, better than that of serum CA-125 (64%) and that of CI (62%). Equally in low-grade ovarian carcinomas (n = 55), PET/CT accuracy (87%) was significantly higher than that of the tumor marker (60%) and also higher than that of CI (70%).ConclusionsFDG PET/CT was proven to be more efficient than serum CA-125 assay and CI in detecting recurrences of ovarian cancer after treatment. The sensitivity of FDG PET/CT is not influenced by tumor histology. FDG PET/CT should be considered a useful diagnostic tool in the surveillance of patients that received treatment for epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…