• Sci. Total Environ. · Mar 2005

    Comparative Study

    A comparison of total mercury and methylmercury export from various Minnesota watersheds.

    • Steven J Balogh, Yabing H Nollet, and Heather J Offerman.
    • Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, 2400 Childs Road, St. Paul, MN 55106-6724, USA. steve.balogh@metc.state.mn.us
    • Sci. Total Environ. 2005 Mar 20; 340 (1-3): 261-70.

    AbstractMethylmercury (MeHg) bioaccumulates in aquatic food webs and can pose health risks to animals at higher trophic levels. Characterization of MeHg production in and export from watersheds can help clarify exposure scenarios for aquatic life downstream. A number of studies have demonstrated that anoxic conditions in the saturated soils of wetlands can promote the production of MeHg, and these wetlands may be major sources of MeHg to connected water bodies. Here, we report in-stream loadings of total mercury (THg) and MeHg for five rivers in Minnesota (USA). The watersheds of these rivers differ widely in the proportion of land area made up by wetlands and in other land use, drainage, and soil characteristics. Export of THg from these rivers varied widely, with much higher loadings and annual average concentrations of THg in streams of the Minnesota River basin compared to streams in the headwater Mississippi River basin. In contrast and despite the apparent differences in the makeup of these watersheds, yields and annual average concentrations of MeHg were remarkably similar for the rivers studied here. Differences in land use/land cover, drainage, soils, and other characteristics of these watersheds influence the export of both THg and MeHg in these rivers, but overall MeHg yields vary less than THg yields.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…