• Am J Sports Med · May 2017

    Multicenter Study

    The Reliability of Assessing Radiographic Healing of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee.

    • Eric J Wall, Matthew D Milewski, James L Carey, Kevin G Shea, Theodore J Ganley, John D Polousky, Nathan L Grimm, Emily A Eismann, Jake C Jacobs, Lucas Murnaghan, Carl W Nissen, Gregory D Myer, Research in Osteochondritis of the Knee (ROCK) Group, Jennifer Weiss, Eric W Edmonds, Allen F Anderson, Roger M Lyon, Benton E Heyworth, Peter D Fabricant, and Andy Zbojniewicz.
    • Investigation performed at the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
    • Am J Sports Med. 2017 May 1; 45 (6): 1370-1375.

    BackgroundThe reliability of assessing healing on plain radiographs has not been well-established for knee osteochondritis dissecans (OCD).PurposeTo determine the inter- and intrarater reliability of specific radiographic criteria in judging healing of femoral condyle OCD.Study DesignCohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.MethodsTen orthopedic sports surgeons rated the radiographic healing of 30 knee OCD lesions at 2 time points, a minimum of 1 month apart. First, raters compared pretreatment and 2-year follow-up radiographs on "overall healing" and on 5 subfeatures of healing, including OCD boundary, sclerosis, size, shape, and ossification using a continuous slider scale. "Overall healing" was also rated using a 7-tier ordinal scale. Raters then compared the same 30 pretreatment knee radiographs in a stepwise progression to the 2-, 4-, 7-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up radiographs on "overall healing" using a continuous slider scale. Interrater and intrarater reliability were assessed using intraclass correlations (ICC) derived from a 2-way mixed effects analysis of variance for absolute agreement.ResultsOverall healing of the OCD lesions from pretreatment to 2-year follow-up radiographs was rated with excellent interrater reliability (ICC = 0.94) and intrarater reliability (ICC = 0.84) when using a continuous scale. The reliability of the 5 subfeatures of healing was also excellent (interrater ICCs of 0.87-0.89; intrarater ICCs of 0.74-0.84). The 7-tier ordinal scale rating of overall healing had lower interrater (ICC = 0.61) and intrarater (ICC = 0.68) reliability. The overall healing of OCD lesions at the 5 time points up to 24 months had interrater ICCs of 0.81-0.88 and intrarater ICCs of 0.65-0.70.ConclusionInterrater reliability was excellent when judging the overall healing of OCD femoral condyle lesions on radiographs as well as on 5 specific features of healing on 2-year follow-up radiographs. Continuous scale rating of OCD radiographic healing yielded higher reliability than the ordinal scale rating. Raters showed substantial to excellent agreement of OCD overall radiographic healing measured on a continuous scale at 2, 4, 7, 12, and 24 months after starting treatment.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…