• Herz · Dec 1994

    Review

    [Therapy of cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarct].

    • G Görge, M Haude, D Baumgart, S Sack, J Ge, R Leischik, and R Erbel.
    • Abteilung für Kardiologie, Universität (Gesamthochschule) Essen.
    • Herz. 1994 Dec 1;19(6):360-70.

    AbstractCardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction patients is the most common cause of in-hospital death. Various studies showed, that 60 to 100% of patients in cardiogenic shock will die, if no early reperfusion of their coronary artery could be established. The incidence of cardiogenic shock has decreased during the last years, most likely due to early thrombolytic therapy and administration of nitroglycerin. Reasons for cardiogenic shock are either necrosis of 40% or more of the left ventricular wall, right heart infarction, or complications which can be treated by the surgeon, like papillary muscle rupture, ventricular septal defect or rupture of the free ventricular wall. Diagnosis is based on clinical criteria, echocardiography, and on hemodynamic monitoring. The hemodynamic criteria for cardiogenic shock are a cardiac index of < 2.2/l, and an increased wedge pressure of > 18 mm Hg; additionally, diuresis is usually < 20 ml/h. Therapy can be divided into the following categories: a) pharmaceutical interventions to increase cardiac output like vasodilators or positive inotrope drugs; b) mechanical support systems; c) acute interventions with the aim of reperfusion; d) acute surgical interventions addressing complications like papillary muscle rupture, ventricular septal defect or rupture of the free ventricular wall. While steps a) and b) are able to stabilize the hemodynamical situation in patients with cardiogenic shock, they are rarely the definitive treatment. Point c), reperfusion of the coronary artery, can be divided in thrombolysis or acute PTCA. Thrombolysis failed to show a beneficial effect in most studies, either after intravenous or intracoronary application. On contrast, acute PTCA showed to be of great benefit in various studies with a technical success rate of 54 to 100% and a survival rate of patients from 58 to 100%. Thus, emergency PTCA is the treatment of choice in cardiogenic shock. Point d), surgical interventions can be divided in acute bypass grafting, which should be reserved for patients with severe multivessel disease, left main involvement, or failed PTCA. Furthermore, acute heart transplantation is effective, but will be possible in a minority of patients only. The last part of surgically manageable complications are surgery of papillary muscle rupture and ventricular septal defect. Results of early surgery in papillary muscle rupture or ventricular septal defects are much better than delayed interventions. Rupture of the free wall is usually a fatal event. In summary, the most successful therapy of cardiogenic shock is early emergency PTCA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…