• Jeffrey R Olsen, Clifford G Robinson, Issam El Naqa, Kimberly M Creach, Robert E Drzymala, Charles Bloch, Parag J Parikh, and Jeffrey D Bradley.
• Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
• Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011 Nov 15; 81 (4): e299-303.

PurposeTo compare the efficacy of three lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimens in a large institutional cohort.MethodsBetween 2004 and 2009, 130 patients underwent definitive lung cancer SBRT to a single lesion at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology. We delivered 18 Gy × 3 fractions for peripheral tumors (n = 111) and either 9 Gy × 5 fractions (n = 8) or 10 Gy × 5 fractions (n = 11) for tumors that were central or near critical structures. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model.ResultsMedian follow-up was 11, 16, and 13 months for the 9 Gy × 5, 10 Gy × 5, and 18 Gy × 3 groups, respectively. Local control statistics for Years 1 and 2 were, respectively, 75% and 50% for 9 Gy × 5, 100% and 100% for 10 Gy × 5, and 99% and 91% for 18 Gy × 3. Median overall survival was 14 months, not reached, and 34 months for the 9 Gy × 5, 10 Gy × 5, and 18 Gy × 3 treatments, respectively. No difference in local control or overall survival was found between the 10 Gy × 5 and 18 Gy × 3 groups on log-rank test, but both groups had improved local control and overall survival compared with 9 Gy × 5. Treatment with 9 Gy × 5 was the only independent prognostic factor for reduced local control on multivariate analysis, and increasing age, increasing tumor volume, and poor performance status predicted independently for reduced overall survival.ConclusionTreatment regimens of 10 Gy × 5 and 18 Gy × 3 seem to be efficacious for lung cancer SBRT and provide superior local control and overall survival compared with 9 Gy × 5.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

26 keywords...

hide…