• Cancer · Feb 2000

    Comparative Study

    Feasibility and early results of accelerated radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma in the elderly.

    • A S Allal, D Maire, M Becker, and P Dulguerov.
    • Division of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
    • Cancer. 2000 Feb 1; 88 (3): 648-52.

    BackgroundAccelerated radiotherapy (RT) represents a promising method with which to improve the treatment outcome in patients with head and neck carcinoma. However, its applicability to elderly patients has not been well established. This study assessed treatment toxicities, patient compliance, and oncologic results in patients age >/= 70 years who were treated with an accelerated concomitant boost RT schedule.MethodsBetween 1991 and 1997, 39 patients aged >/= 70 years (mean, 75 +/- 6 years) presenting with carcinomas of the oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx were treated radically with a modified concomitant boost RT schedule (planned dose of 69.9 grays [Gy] over 38 days). Based on American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, there were 14 patients with Stage I-II disease and 25 patients with Stage III-IV disease. Eighty-one patients age < 70 years who were treated with the same RT schedule served as a comparative group. The median follow-up for the surviving patients was 19 months (range, 3-65 months) and 23 months (range, 2-76 months), respectively, for the elderly and younger patient groups.ResultsThe planned RT schedule was completed in all cases. Three patients (8%) in the elderly group and none in the younger group had an unplanned treatment interruption because of acute toxicity or lack of compliance (P = 0.03). The median tumor dose (69.9 Gy; range, 67-73 Gy) and the median overall treatment time (41 days; range, 36-60 days) were identical in both groups. According to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grading system, Grade 3-4 acute reactions were observed in 66% of elderly patients and in 71% of younger patients. Ten elderly patients (26%) and 19 younger patients (23%) required a nasogastric tube or a percutaneous gastrostomy for feeding, with a median weight loss of 4.1 kg and 4.4 kg, respectively, in the 2 groups. Grade 3-4 late complications were observed in 3% of the elderly patients and 10% of the younger patients (P = 0.43). Both elderly and younger patients had similar results with regard to 3-year actuarial overall survival (68% vs. 62%; P = 0.48) and locoregional control (73% vs. 68%; P = 0.31).ConclusionsThe current study suggests that an accelerated concomitant boost RT schedule is feasible in elderly patients who are physically healthy enough to undergo curative treatment. The acute and late toxicities appear to be similar to those observed in younger patients, and treatment outcomes appear to be comparable.Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…