• F J Berends, N Schep, M A Cuesta, H J Bonjer, M C Kappers-Klunne, P Huijgens, and G Kazemier.
• Department of General Surgery, Ziekenhuis Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
• Surg Endosc. 2004 May 1; 18 (5): 766-70.

BackgroundLaparoscopic splenectomy (LS) for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) appears, when compared to open splenectomy (OS), associated with immediate important advantages. However, in a number of patients splenectomy does not lead to an adequate response, or after initial adequate response a relapse occurs after some time. A relapse may be associated to the presence of accessory spleens and splenosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the operative outcome and the hematological results on the long term of a series of LS with a historic series of OS for the treatment of ITP.MethodsA retrospective review was done of 50 consecutive patients who underwent LS for ITP. Patient characteristics, outcome of surgery, and hematological results were compared to a historical group of patients who underwent conventional splenectomy for ITP (n = 31). Response to splenectomy was defined in three groups: complete remission, partial remission, and no response. Grouping was based on hematological data.ResultsConcerning operative outcome and postoperative complications, there was a significant difference in favor of LS. Moreover, the hematological outcome of both groups showed no differences after a median period of 66 months (OS) and 35 months (LS), respectively.ConclusionsHematological results after laparoscopic splenectomy for ITP are comparable to those after open splenectomy in both the short and the long term.

20 keywords...

hide…