• Int J Obstet Anesth · Oct 1997

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    A double-blind assessment of the analgesic sparing effect of intrathecal diamorphine (0.3 mg) with spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section.

    • D Graham and I F Russell.
    • Department of Anaesthesia, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, UK.
    • Int J Obstet Anesth. 1997 Oct 1; 6 (4): 224-30.

    AbstractIn a randomized double-blind study, 40 healthy women undergoing elective caesarean section with spinal anaesthesia received either 0.3 mg diamorphine or saline with bupivacaine 0.5% in 8% dextrose. The study recorded time to the first morphine demand delivered by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and total morphine requirement over 24 h. In addition pain, sedation, and pruritus were assessed by non-graduated visual analogue scores (VAS). Six patients in the diamorphine group required no postoperative morphine. The median (interquartile range) time to first morphine demand was significantly longer in the diamorphine group at 340 min (127, never used), than in the control group at 80 min (53, 159) (P 0.0006, 95% confidence interval for the difference between the medians is 60 to 1235 min). The use of PCA morphine over 24 h was significantly less in the diamorphine group than in the controls. The medians (interquartile ranges) were 5 (0, 36) mg vs 45 (26, 72) mg (P 0.0045, 95% confidence interval for the difference between the medians is 12 to 46 mg). In the diamorphine group, postoperative VAS for pain was significantly lower at 2 h and 3 h both at rest (P 0.0003, 0.003) and on moving (P 0.009, 0.002), at 8 h on moving (P 0.01), and at 12 and 24 h at rest (P 0.005, 0.029). Significantly more women suffered pruritus in the diamorphine group for the first 12 h after surgery (P 0.01).

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.