-
Review Meta Analysis
Use of trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer beyond disease progression: a systematic review of published studies.
- Alice Mannocci, Emma De Feo, Chiara de Waure, Maria Lucia Specchia, Maria Rosaria Gualano, Carlo Barone, Walter Ricciardi, and Giuseppe La Torre.
- HTA Public Health Unit, Institute of Hygiene, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. alice.mannocci@rm.unicatt.it
- Tumori. 2010 May 1; 96 (3): 385-91.
Aims And BackgroundTrastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of ErbB, has determined clinical benefit for women affected by metastatic or early stage HER2-positive breast cancer and never previously treated with trastuzumab. Trastuzumab is generally used as first-line treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and is currently administered beyond progression even without clear evidence supporting such clinical practice. In fact, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer has a high risk of progressing after first-line therapy, and second-line treatments vary. The aim of the study was to investigate by a systematic review the efficacy of trastuzumab-based treatments beyond progression in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.Materials And MethodsWe performed a systematic review using Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library data bases and publications in principal meetings or congresses of oncology in Europe and America until September 2008. The main selection criterium was the reporting of time to progression, calculated from the start of each trastuzumab-based therapy to the date of progressive disease or death.ResultsTwelve studies were selected that included a total of 516 patients. The weighted mean time to progression was 23.66 weeks (standard deviation, 4.37) and the median was 26 weeks (range, 13-39). Interestingly, combined trastuzumab plus vinorelbine treatment showed a lower mean and median time to progression (20.59 and 19.57 weeks, respectively), whereas trastuzumab plus capecitabine yielded a mean time to progression of 30.33 weeks.ConclusionsThe added value of the present study has been to provide a quantitative summary measure of time to progression which can be used for comparisons between current and future available regimens.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.