-
- Shivani Ahlawat, Carol Morris, and Laura M Fayad.
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. sahlawa1@jhmi.edu.
- Skeletal Radiol. 2016 May 1; 45 (5): 645-52.
BackgroundTo assess the acquisition speed, lesion conspicuity, and inter-observer agreement associated with volumetric T(1)-weighted MR sequences with isotropic resolution for detecting recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma (STS).MethodsFifteen subjects with histologically proven recurrent STS underwent MRI, including axial and coronal T(1)-weighted spin echo (T(1)-WSE) (5-mm slice thickness) and coronal 3D volumetric T(1)-weighted (fat-suppressed, volume-interpolated, breath-hold examination; repetition time/echo time, 3.7/1.4 ms; flip angle, 9.5°; 1-mm slice thickness) sequences before and after intravenous contrast administration. Subtraction imaging and multiplanar reformations (MPRs) were performed. Acquisition times for T(1)-WSE in two planes and 3D sequences were reported. Two radiologists reviewed images for quality (>50 % artifacts, 25-50 % artifacts, <25 % artifacts, and no substantial artifacts), lesion conspicuity, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR(muscle)), recurrence size, and recurrence-to-joint distance. Descriptive and intraclass correlation (ICC) statistics are given.ResultsMean acquisition times were significantly less for 3D imaging compared with 2-plane T(1)-WSE (183.6 vs 342.6 s; P = 0.012). Image quality was rated as having no substantial artifacts in 13/15 and <25 % artifacts in 2/15. Lesion conspicuity was significantly improved for subtracted versus unsubtracted images (CNR(muscle), 100 ± 138 vs 181 ± 199; P = 0.05). Mean recurrent lesion size was 2.5 cm (range, 0.7-5.7 cm), and measurements on 3D sequences offered excellent interobserver agreement (ICC, 0.98 for lesion size and 0.96 for recurrence-to-joint distance with MPR views).ConclusionThree-dimensional volumetric sequences offer faster acquisition times, higher spatial resolution, and MPR capability compared with 2D T(1)-WSE for postcontrast imaging. Subtraction imaging provides higher lesion conspicuity for detecting recurrent STS in skeletal muscle, with excellent interobserver agreement between readers.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?