• Shin-Yan Chen, Pei-Lin Lin, Yu-Hsuan Yang, Ya-Min Yang, Chien-Nan Lee, Shou-Zen Fan, and Li-Kuei Chen.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Medical University, Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
• Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar 1;53(1):8-11.

ObjectivesPatient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous epidural infusion (CEI) are popular and effective methods for pain relief during labor; however, there are concerns about increasing rates of cesarean section (C/S) and instrumental delivery. This prospective study investigated the effect of PCEA and CEI with different formulas on labor and the mode of delivery in nulliparous women.Materials And MethodsA total of 480 nulliparous women were randomized into four groups, with 120 in each. Group A received a loading dose of 10 mL of 1 mg/mL ropivacaine with 2 μg/mL fentanyl, then an intermittent bolus of 5 mL with a background infusion of 5 mL/hour by PCEA. Group B received the same PCEA formula as Group A with 0.8 mg/mL bupivacaine. Group C received the same formula as Group A by CEI with 1 mg/mL ropivacaine at a rate of 10 mL/hour. Group D received the same formula as Group C with 0.8 mg/mL bupivacaine. The rates of C/S and instrumental delivery and the incidence of side effects were recorded.ResultsThe rates of C/S were significantly different between Groups A and C, Groups A and D, and Groups B and D. The rates of instrumental delivery for normal spontaneous delivery were significantly different between Groups A and B, A and D, B and C, and C and D.ConclusionThe C/S rate was higher in Groups C and D; however, the instrumental delivery rate was lower in Groups A and C. We conclude that PCEA with 1 mg/mL ropivacaine might provide the greatest benefit for labor analgesia.Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

26 keywords...

hide…