• M Chimienti, M T Cullen, and G Casadei.
• Division of Cardiology, San Donato Hospital, University of Pavia, Italy.
• Eur. Heart J. 1995 Dec 1; 16 (12): 1943-51.

AbstractIn order to compare the long-term safety of flecainide and propafenone, an open label, randomized, parallel group study was performed in 335 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n = 200) or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (n = 135), and no history of heart disease. Patients were treated with an initial daily dose of flecainide 100 mg (n = 72) or propafenone 450 mg (n = 63) for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and flecainide 200 mg (n = 97) or propafenone 450 mg (n = 103) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Dose escalations were permitted after > or = 2 attacks, up to a maximum of flecainide 300 mg or propafenone 900 mg.day-1.Follow-up duration was 12 months, or when patients stopped the treatment as a result of inadequate efficacy or adverse experiences. Twelve patients on flecainide reported 16 cardiac adverse experiences, of whom six discontinued the treatment. Seven propafenone patients had eight cardiac adverse experiences, of whom five discontinued the treatment. Serious proarrhythmic events were infrequent: one case of ventricular tachycardia on propafenone: two cases of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response on flecainide, associated in one patient with pulmonary oedema. An intention-to-treat analysis showed that the probability of 12 months' safe and effective treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia was 93% for flecainide and 86% for propafenone (P = 0.24), whereas in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation it was 77% for flecainide and 75% for propafenone (P = 0.72). In conclusion, flecainide and propafenone were safe in the long-term treatment of patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and without evidence of clinically significant heart disease.

34 keywords...

hide…