• Davide Previtali, Stamen Roumenov Milev, Gherardo Pagliazzi, Giuseppe Filardo, Stefano Zaffagnini, and Christian Candrian.
• Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland (CH). Electronic address: davide.previtali@eoc.ch.
• Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun 1; 36 (6): 1725-1734.

PurposeTo provide a direct comparison between medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and the other medial patellofemoral soft-tissue surgeries in the restoration of the medial patellar restraint after lateral patellar dislocations in the absence of untreated predisposing factors such as high grade trochlear dysplasia, knee malalignment, patella alta or high tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane-library, Web of Science, and gray literature databases were searched to find all the relevant records. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed following the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Different techniques to treat lateral patellar dislocation in the absence of untreated predisposing factors were compared in terms of redislocation and complication rates, Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Tegner scores at the short-term (3 years) and long-term (>3 years) follow-up through meta-analyses.ResultsSix studies involving 319 knees were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses of redislocation (0.7% vs 2.9%) and minor complication rates (12% vs 9%) showed no significant differences between MPFL reconstruction and other medial soft-tissue surgeries. Significant differences favoring MPFL reconstruction were documented in Kujala and Lysholm scores at short-term (8.6, P< .001; 10.9, P < .001) and long-term follow-ups (6.3, P = .02; 13.5, P < .001). No significant differences were found in the analyses of International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .10) and Tegner scores (P = .19). Level of evidence was low or very low.ConclusionsMPFL reconstruction and medial patellofemoral soft-tissue surgery procedures were both effective in restoring the medial restraining forces preventing redislocation, but MPFL reconstruction provided better functional outcomes both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Thus, besides the treatment of predisposing factors, MPFL reconstruction seems to be, based on the results of this meta-analysis, a suitable strategy to restore the medial restraining function in the treatment of recurrent LPD.Level Of EvidenceLevel III (meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized comparative trials).Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

19 keywords...

hide…