• A-K Wikström, S Cnattingius, M R Galanti, H Kieler, and O Stephansson.
• Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. anna-karin.wikstrom@kbh.uu.se
• BJOG. 2010 Jul 1; 117 (8): 1005-10.

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of Swedish snuff and cigarette smoking on risks of preterm birth.DesignPopulation-based cohort study.SettingSweden.PopulationAll live, singleton births in Sweden 1999-2006.MethodsOdds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate relative risks for preterm birth in snuff users (n = 7607), light smokers (1-9 cigarettes/day; n = 41 436) and heavy smokers (ten or more cigarettes/day; n = 16 951) using non-tobacco users (n = 503 957) as reference.Main Outcome MeasuresVery (<32 weeks) and moderately (32-36 weeks) preterm birth.ResultsCompared with non-tobacco users, snuff users had increased risks of both very (adjusted OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.04-1.83) and moderately (adjusted OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.12-1.40) preterm birth. Compared with non-tobacco users, light smokers had increased risks of both very (adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.42-1.81) and moderately (adjusted OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.12-1.24) preterm birth, and heavy smokers had even higher risks. Among smokers, but not among snuff users, the risk was more pronounced for spontaneous than induced preterm birth.ConclusionsThe use of Swedish snuff was associated with increased risks of very and moderately preterm birth with both spontaneous and induced onsets. Swedish snuff is not a safe alternative to cigarette smoking during pregnancy.

18 keywords...

hide…