• Sheila A Doggrell.
• Queensland University of Technology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Australia. sheila.doggrell@qut.edu.au
• Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013 Jun 1; 14 (9): 1269-73.

AbstractThere is a debate as to whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is the best procedure for subjects with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease requiring revascularization. There is some evidence that by following these procedures, there is less further revascularization with CABG than PCI in subjects with diabetes. Two recent studies, namely, the FREEDOM (Future Revascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Optimal Management of Multivessel Disease) trial and a trial using a real-world diabetic population from a Registry have shown that the benefits of CABG over PCI in subjects with type 2 diabetes extend to lower rates of death and myocardial infarction, in addition to lower rates of revascularization. However, the rates of stroke may be higher with CABG than PCI with drug-eluting stents in this population. Thus, if CABG is going to be preferred to PCI in subjects with type 2 diabetes and multivessel coronary disease, consideration should be given as to how to reduce the rates of stroke with CABG.

11 keywords...

hide…