• Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Aug 2000

    Does the combination of radiotherapy and debulking surgery favor survival in paranasal sinus carcinoma?

    • E P Jansen, R B Keus, F J Hilgers, R L Haas, I B Tan, and H Bartelink.
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. epm.jansen@azvu.nl
    • Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2000 Aug 1; 48 (1): 27-35.

    PurposeTo determine the contribution of debulking surgery on local control and survival in paranasal sinus tumors. As most patients present with locally advanced disease, the possibility of radical surgery is limited. Consequently, radiotherapy is often needed as monotherapy or as an adjunct to surgery.Methods And MaterialsBetween 1977 and 1996, 73 patients (50 male: 23 female) with a paranasal sinus carcinoma were treated. The histology distribution was as follows: squamous cell carcinoma, 55%; adenocarcinoma, 19%; adenoid cystic carcinoma, 11%; and undifferentiated carcinoma, 15%. The clinical T classification was (UICC/TNM 1997): T2 14%, T3 27%, and T4 59%. Pathological neck nodes were found in 11% of patients. Treatment consisted of surgery only in 3, chemotherapy only in 1, radiotherapy only in 18, both surgery and radiotherapy in 50 patients. One patient did not receive any treatment at all. Three patients had concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 66 months (range, 1-213 months).ResultsFive-year local control (LC) was 65% with combination of radiotherapy and debulking surgery in comparison with 47% with radiotherapy alone, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.58). However, combination treatment gave significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) (60% vs. 9%; p = 0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (53% vs. 6%; p < 0. 0001). Cox-regression analysis showed that pathologic N status (p = 0.04), palliative intention of treatment (p = 0.018), clinical orbital invasion (p = 0.003), and orbital wall invasion (p = 0.003) were parameters significantly associated with poor local control. Total radiation dose of greater than 65 Gy (p = 0.05) and treatment consisting of radiotherapy alone (p = 0.002) were associated with worse overall survival; for disease-free survival clinical orbital invasion (p = 0.0005), age of greater than 65 years (p = 0.013) and pathologic T4 classification (p = 0.002) were significant factors for an unfavorable outcome. In 19 of 73 patients, 26 serious (mainly ophthalmological) complications were reported; in the majority of these, the visual tract was (partly) included in the treatment fields because of tumor extension. To analyze on which basis patients were selected for the combination therapy, a logistic regression was performed, concluding that clinical T4 classification (p = 0.05), radiological evidence of skull base invasion (p = 0.005), age of greater than 65 years (p = 0.026), radiological evidence of nasopharynx invasion (p = 0.02), clinical suspicion of palate invasion (p = 0.02), and radiological evidence of skin invasion (p = 0.009) were associated with choosing radiotherapy alone.ConclusionDebulking surgery of paranasal sinus malignancies followed by high-dose radiotherapy to the involved sites was associated with better survival and (although not statistically significant) local control. Patient selection, based on clinical and radiological impression of tumor extension, was the main factor explaining these favorable results. We favor this combination regimen because the surgery gives quick relief of complaints and, at the same time, offers an excellent histologically proven staging method, enabling radiotherapy to be adjusted to the involved sites, thereby decreasing the risk of complications. This can all be achieved with a very low orbital exenteration rate.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…