• Roni Levy, Edi Vaisbuch, Boris Furman, Dov Brown, Vania Volach, and Zion J Hagay.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Jerusalem, Israel. roni_L@clalit.org.il
• J Perinat Med. 2007 Jan 1; 35 (2): 126-9.

AimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and an unfavorable cervix.MethodsWe randomized 130 women with PROM of < or =4 h to either oral misoprostol, 50 microg, or a placebo given every 4 h for up to three doses. Intravenous oxytocin was initiated if active labor did not begin within 12 h.ResultsSixty-four women received oral misoprostol and 66 received placebo. The PROM-to-delivery interval was shorter with misoprostol than with placebo (13.7+/-5.8 vs. 20.3+/-6.8 h, respectively, P<0.05). Misoprostol significantly reduced the need for oxytocin (28.1 vs. 72.7%, P<0.001) and antibiotics (25 vs. 69.7%, P<0.001). No significant differences in cesarean section or hyperstimulation rate were noted.ConclusionOral misoprostol given to women with unfavorable cervix soon after term PROM significantly reduces the induction-to-delivery time and the need for oxytocin and antibiotics.

18 keywords...

hide…