• Int. J. Cardiol. · Sep 2013

    Feasibility of free-breathing late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular MRI for assessment of myocardial infarction: navigator-gated versus single-shot imaging.

    • Hidenari Matsumoto, Tetsuya Matsuda, Kenichi Miyamoto, Kenji Nakatsuma, Masataka Sugahara, and Toshihiko Shimada.
    • Cardiovascular Center, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. matsumoto.hidenari@gmail.com
    • Int. J. Cardiol. 2013 Sep 20; 168 (1): 94-9.

    ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of two free-breathing late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) techniques (two-dimensional segmented navigator-gated [NAV-LGE] and single-shot [SS-LGE]) by comparing with breath-hold LGE-CMR (BH-LGE) as reference.MethodsA total of 200 consecutive patients underwent the three LGE-CMR imaging techniques. BH patterns were assessed with dynamic navigator MR imaging. Image quality was graded on a 5-point scale (4=optimal; 0=not assessable). In patients with sufficient BH capability (diaphragmatic movement with a deviation of <3mm), hyperenhancement was scored with a 5-point scale, and global infarct size (%left ventricle) was quantified.ResultsCompared to free-breathing LGE-CMR, BH-LGE had higher image quality grade in patients with sufficient BH capability (P<0.01 [vs. NAV-LGE]; P<0.001 [vs. SS-LGE]) but poorer image quality in patients with insufficient BH capability (P<0.001 [vs. NAV-LGE]; P<0.01 [vs. SS-LGE]). NAV-LGE had higher sensitivity for infarct detection than SS-LGE (97.1% vs. 88.4%, P<0.05), but specificity was not significantly different (97.3% vs. 94.7%, P=0.37). By Bland-Altman analysis, the average differences in global infarct size were 0.4% and 1.2%, and the limits of agreement were ± 4.0% and ± 5.9% for NAV- and SS-LGE, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough both NAV- and SS-LGE improve the image quality in patients with insufficient BH capability, NAV-LGE is superior to SS-LGE in infarct detection and infarct size measurement. NAV-LGE can be a possible first-line technique for patients with inability to perform sufficient BH.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.