• J Craniofac Surg · May 2016

    How Patients Percept Their Recovery Following Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Coronectomy.

    • Yifat Manor, Amal Bader, Gavriel Chaushu, Doron Haim, Alex Manor, Alper Gultekin, and Eitan Mijiritsky.
    • *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv†Oral Health and Dental Implantation Center, Assaf Harofe Medical Center, Zrifin‡Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva§Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel||Department of Oral Implantology, Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey¶Department of Oral Rehabilitation and The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
    • J Craniofac Surg. 2016 May 1; 27 (3): 671-4.

    ObjectivesTo compare the quality of life (QOL), side effects, risks, and complications following mandibular third molar coronectomy compared with conventional third molar extraction.MethodsSixty-nine patients referred for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars were prospectively studied. The decision to perform coronectomy was made according to radiological data indicative of a risk for inferior alveolar nerve injury. The patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire on their QOL during the first postoperative week, and the surgeon was asked to fill out a questionnaire on these patients' demographic, clinical, and radiological details as well as surgery-related data. The study participants were followed up for at least 1 year postoperatively.ResultsThirty-four of the 69 patients underwent coronectomy (study group) and 35 underwent full extraction (control group(. There was no group difference in QOL scores during the first postoperative week. There was no patient of nerve injury in either group. No complications were found in the postoperative period. Two patients of coronectomy necessitate residual tooth removal prior to planned orthodontic treatment.ConclusionsThese patients' QOL are similar to those for patients following total extraction. No difference in side effects following procedure was found between coronectomy and total extraction.Clinical RelevanceCoronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars may be offered instead of total extraction in patients presenting radiological characteristics of root proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.