• Natasha Yashar, Christopher G Engeland, Alan L Rosenfeld, Timothy P Walsh, and Joseph V Califano.
• Department of Periodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
• J. Periodontol. 2012 Jan 1; 83 (1): 36-42.

BackgroundPrevious studies of the inferior alveolar nerve have used cadaveric specimens in small patient groups. The purpose of this study was to describe the anatomy in the posterior mandible with respect to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) using computed tomography (CT) images in a large patient population. We hypothesize that CT scans are an important component of a thorough treatment plan for minimizing risk to the IAN and optimizing surgical outcomes.MethodsCT scans of 195 patients (62 males and 133 females; age range: 22 to 88 years) were evaluated retrospectively. With the aid of computer software, cross-sectional images were examined at 5-mm increments distal to the mental foramen to the ascending ramus. Four measurements were made at each cross-sectional image. The distances from the IAN to the: 1) alveolar crest (CN); 2) buccal cortical plate (BN); 3) lingual cortical plate (LN); and 4) inferior border (IN) were measured.ResultsMost measurements for males and females were significantly different. Mean values were as follows (males/females): CN, 13.85 ± 0.43/11.98 ± 0.40 mm (P <0.01); BN, 4.98 ± 0.15/4.47 ± 0.11 mm (P <0.01); LN, 2.93 ± 0.12/3.19 ± 0.10 mm (P <0.10); and IN, 7.76 ± 0.16/7.00 ± 0.15 mm (P <0.01). The 95% confidence intervals indicated that many patients had limited bone volume in the buccal shelf or ascending ramus.ConclusionGiven the high degree of variability in mandibular bone volume surrounding the IAN and the position of the IAN, the use of CT scans should be considered for surgical procedures in the posterior mandible when there is risk of injury to the IAN.

29 keywords...

hide…