• Surgical endoscopy · Jul 2009

    Comparative Study

    Laparoscopic versus open approach for implantation of the peritoneal catheter during ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.

    • Joshua L Argo, Durgamani K Yellumahanthi, Naveen Ballem, Mark R Harrigan, Winfield S Fisher, Mary M Wesley, Tracy H Taylor, and Ronald H Clements.
    • Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0016, USA.
    • Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul 1; 23 (7): 1449-55.

    BackgroundVentriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is the mainstay of therapy for hydrocephalus. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of laparoscopic (LVPS) versus open (OVPS) techniques for placement of distal VPS catheters.MethodsAll patients undergoing new VPS placement at a tertiary care center between January 2004 and August 2007 were included. Univariate analysis was performed. Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used to make comparisons between LVPS and OVPS groups. Stepwise backward logistic regression was performed to predict complications requiring operative intervention. A Kaplan-Meier estimate of the survival function was calculated for shunt survival. All data is presented as median and range unless otherwise specified.ResultsFive hundred thirty-five consecutive patients underwent 579 VPS (258 LVPS, 321 OVPS). Median age (52.0 years) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (3) were similar in LVPS and OVPS groups. Body mass index (BMI) [27.8 (17.0-64.9) kg/m(2) versus 25.9 (12.3-44.4) kg/m(2), p = 0.007], previous operations [0.8 +/- 0.9 versus 0.6 +/- 0.7, p = 0.004 (mean +/- standard deviation)], estimated blood loss (EBL) [20 (0-175) ml versus 25 (0-500) ml, p < 0.001], operating room (OR) time [37.5 (17.0-152.0) min versus 52.0 (20.0-197.0) min, p < 0.001], and length of stay (LOS) [11 (1-77) days versus 14 (1-225) days, p = 0.016] were statistically different between the LVPS and OVPS groups, respectively. LVPS abdominal complication rate of 5.8% and OVPS rate of 6.9% were similar (p = 0.611). Previous abdominal operation [odds ratio (OR) 1.673, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.100-2.543, p = 0.016] and previous VPS (OR 1.929, 95% CI 1.147-3.243, p = 0.016) were significant predictors of complications requiring operative intervention. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in survival between LVPS and OVPS groups (p = 0.538), with overall shunt survival of 86.4% at 6 months and 83.0% at 1 year.ConclusionsLVPS is associated with decreased OR time, less blood loss, and shorter LOS with no difference in complication rate when compared OVPS. The laparoscopic approach for VPS is a safe, effective, and readily reproducible alternative to the traditional open approach.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.