• Journal of anesthesia · Jun 2011

    The success rate of nasotracheal intubation using lightwand does not depend on the laryngoscopic view.

    • Yozo Manabe, Mika Seto, Shigeru Iwamoto, Shinji Tominaga, and Shogo Taniguchi.
    • Department of Systemic Management for Dentistry, Kagoshima University Medical and Dental Hospital, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8544, Japan. yozo3105manabe@yahoo.co.jp
    • J Anesth. 2011 Jun 1;25(3):350-5.

    PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of Trachlight (TL) for nasotracheal intubation and to determine the relationship between the grade of laryngeal view and the subsequent ease of nasotracheal intubation using TL.MethodsPatients requiring nasotracheal intubation were enrolled in this study. Laryngoscopy was performed in all patients under topical anesthesia, with 8% lidocaine spray applied to the supraglottic region and the vocal cords. Glottic visualization during laryngoscopy was assessed using the Cormack and Lehane classification. Patients were allocated to four groups according to this classification. If the TL intubation was unsuccessful after three attempts, intubation was carried out using direct laryngoscopy. Intubation difficulty was assessed by the original 6-point scale and the total intubation time was also recorded.ResultsTrachlight intubation was successful in 89.1% of the 110 patients enrolled in the study. There was no observed correlation between the original 6-point scale and glottic visualization. The total intubation time and the ratio of "unsuccessful" cases were not significantly different among the four groups.ConclusionNo relationship was found between the ease of nasotracheal intubation using TL and glottic visualization.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…